Babygirl, a provocative and thematically rich erotic thriller, emerges from the 2024 slate with audacity. Halina Reijn’s direction wields the material with surgical precision, guiding Nicole Kidman toward one of the most exposed and daring performances of her career. Against the antiseptic gleam of contemporary corporate America, the narrative chronicles a perilous connection between a commanding older woman and her younger subordinate, interrogating the elastic boundaries of control, intimacy, and the fevered space where longing curdles into capitulation.
Romy Mathis, a precocious tech luminary buoyed by genius and capital, runs a blinking helpdesk empire from her Manhattan perch. By all outward indicators, her life hums along the engineered cadence of success: a sympathetic husband, Jacob, who crafts avant-garde theatre, and two daughters drifting from adolescence to the cusp of brilliance. Domestic rituals—school drop-offs and late-night Investor calls—flow with a dutiful veneer. Yet, beneath the lacquered exterior, a hunger that even wealth and admiration cannot parch flickers unstaked and unattended. When she encounters Samuel, the unadorned and decidedly younger intern, the fault-line opens. Samuel moves within the orbit of her brilliance like a clumsy comet, shy yet unblinking, a double shot of curiosity and resolution that liquefies her self-preservation. Their ensuing meeting, both revelatory and off-kilter, compels Romy to orchestrate an unravel—she requests a clandestine rendezvous at a glassy Beacon Hill hotel, instructing the boy to overpower her. A single evening unspooled into collateral darkness. She acquiesces, he instructs, and she wakes to an unfamiliar ache: the unsettled recognition of her body daring to feel.
The affair between Romy and Samuel quickly spirals into an all-consuming blend of physical and emotional intimacy. For Romy, the momentary thrill of risk makes her feel alive again, a jolt of sensation coursing through her long-regulated veins. Yet the ratios of power fall immediately into disquieting contrast—she is the company’s headline CEO, he is her summer intern. Surrounded by adrenaline and consequence, she chooses to step beyond the strictly demarcated borders of her life and feels the magnetic pull of the terrain that lies beyond. The emotional truth becomes undeniable, the moment of breach itself a moment of fierce, lucid coherence. The zone is lawless, and Romy willingly becomes a law unto herself.
As the liaison deepens, Romy’s sense of internal fracture accelerates. The performances of the dutiful wife, the nurturing mother, the imperious business magnate are displaced—then dismantled— by the dawning recognition of her own sexual self. Samuel, who enters the equation cloaked in ambiguous innocence, shifts gradually into a magnetic, authoritative center of gravity, claiming space first between the sheets, then vortexing inwardly into her waking thoughts. Hierarchies reverse until she stands in a zone of vertigo. What once felt recreational turns voracious, the stolen hours at first liberating soon arriving with a predatory clockwork predictability. The empire she has forged feels increasingly like kindling, and she, the arbiter, no longer recognizes the hands administering the flame.
Nicole Kidman embodies Romy with unsparing, intricate, and sublimely controlled fervor, the kind of performance that seems to surgically excise layers until only the vulnerable core is left seeping. Kidman clarifies the paradox of Romy’s universe: she commands boardrooms and agendas, yet her own psyche is the only territory left ungoverned. The silences between her lines house a trembling music of dread, desire, and betrayal. Kidman’s restraint magnifies that internal tremor until the viewer feels the very choreography by which Romy hides her internalized shame and raw longing. The emotional terrain is never oversung—muted, raw, painstakingly honest, every intake of breath becomes an aria of self-collision.
Harris Dickinson delivers a haunting portrayal of Samuel that holds the viewer in a persistent, magnetic spell. Initially, he appears disarmingly naïve, almost comically awkward; yet a deeper, repressed self-assurance simmers beneath the surface and grows steadily, quietly, irreversible. As Samuel’s connection with Romy deepens, he oscillates between the role of catalyst and captive, the awakening he triggers eventually flaunting a hollow yet seductive power that quietly unsettles. Each flicker of his expression records layers of meaning, none of them benign.
Antonio Banderas incarnates Jacob with impeccably calibrated tenderness, the stillness of a savior drained of the theatrics of heroism. At his side, Romy lounges in the warmth of love, yet the very furtiveness of his gaze indicates a refreshing pallor that renders the comfort transient. Jacob exists to remind her that equilibrium can entrap the spirit. Banderas’ restraint thus grows loud; it frames the heat of Romy and Samuel with white space that heightens every furtive flame and every shared half-smile.
Babygirl is, above all, an anatomy of power: the gestures with which one courts it, the bargains with which one surrenders it, the unmeasured economic turbulence that the exchange exacts. Romy commands the room; figures and pixels yield to her flick of wrist. She chairs meetings, streams dividends, and sculpts a predestined skyline. Yet the dream in her most secret ledger discloses a yearned relinquishing. Within the film’s finely pitched arc, that unconfessed longing disentangles and occupies the space between a half-remembered lark and a scheduled sunrise—against a crooked skyline, surrender is planned, yet possession is seized.
The narrative further interrogates culturally codified assumptions about aging femininity and sexual appetite. Romy appears neither to mourn lost youth nor to repent of appetite. The film presents a layered depiction of a woman who seeks neither escape nor absolution, but rather a moment of full presence amid a lifetime of dutiful choreography. Her sexual realization functions as a reclaiming gesture rather than a falling-into-temptation trope. Consequently, agency becomes visible when desire is located outside gaze and judgment, centered instead within Romy herself.
The psychological subtext of surrender is equally pronounced. Romy is not beckoned to pain as an end, but to experience as a possible means of revealing suppressed self. The encounter becomes a conduit for sensations that decades of tradition and obligation had repressed. Through Samuel, she excavates an identified but unconsummated capacity for intensity. The journey, therefore, is simultaneously kinetic and metaphysical—an energetic forging of limits re-imagined and a reckoning with a self whose urgency had survived, if obscured, surrendering to normality.
Directorial craft, in Halina Reijn’s hands, remains uncompromisingly bifocal: incisive without excess. The film abstains from the ornamental gloss that usually propels erotic articulation in cinema. Clocked instead by a modest, clean lens, the hotel’s inner circulatory icons—mirrors, soft linens, quietly congested light—are assigned weight by prolonged, unspectacular attention. Where sinewy movement might coalesce in a cliché, emotional gravity becomes kinetic moment, illuminative rather than exploitative. The camera refuses beckoning motion, choosing instead to hover, extra lens rather than voyeur—patiently that which grants space to unearth, share, and discursively assess suppressed intensity.
The lens luxuriates in juxtaposed texture. In Romy’s office, glass edges catch an antiseptic light; in her apartment, muted wood offers warmth, yet the mood remains frostbitten. Hotel corridors and motel rooms, in the company of Samuel, breathe with stuttering pulse, their shadows flickering with the truth Romy otherwise keeps submerged. Each frame is a diary entry no one is allowed to edit.
Score is an intermittent pulse. The dragonfly hush is pierced only by the patter of Romy’s own steps, the clicking of a cuff-link, the dilatory sigh of worn timber. When a string stirs, it is because the silence can no longer shoulder the weight of the sighed confession.
Following its premiere, Babygirl became the omnipresent subject of public discourse. Lauded by reviewers, the film’s daring confession, Nicole Kidman’s mesmeric restraint, and its gritty but unsentimental treatment of adult longing electrified panels and press screens alike. Readers and analysts noted it as a rare anatomy of female ache: the unframed tributaries of invisible work, the lodestones of an older body still allowed to lust.
Praise also converged on its treatment of erotic hierarchies. The film refrained from automatic diagnosis; its matins and vespers of rope and protocol arrived instead as negotiated geography, a quiet cartography of trust and recalibration rather than pathology. In favoring dignity over outraged revelation, the script sidestepped the carnival the genre has too often offered.
Audiences were split on the film’s denouement, which closes with many questions lingering, yet uncertainty is part of the film’s magnetism—it refuses easy, schematic moral answers. Instead, the narrative compels the viewer to bear the disquieting hush and to interrogate their own frameworks of authority, longing, and self-definition.
Conclusion
Babygirl exceeds the label of erotic thriller. It remains, at its core, a taut, psychological examination of a woman at a life-defining pivot. It articulates the paradox of mature womanhood: the space in which all outward wishes have been claimed, yet inward ache persists. Employing daring narrative choices, unflinching performances, and audacious directing, the film dismantles cultural modesty, reconfigures questions of agency, and registers the pulse of longing at its most exposed point.
In a current cinema seldom willing to confront the latitude of mature female sexuality with candor, Babygirl reclaims its status as an urgent, unyielding work. The story guards no scandalous revelation; rather, it archives veracity and the steep price of confronting it at last.
Watch free movies on Fmovies